Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
Thermos recalls 8.2 million bottles after stoppers eject,...
Build-A-Bear recalls roughly 36,000 Heart-Warming Hugs Bears
Republican state attorneys general join lawsuit to stop...
Graphic: Track U.S. and state gas prices
Could an ‘8647’ T-shirt get you in trouble?
Companies must now quickly respond to stalking warrants...
Trump signs executive order expanding access to retirement...
FCC head says agency wasn’t pressured to order...
Trump briefed on options for Iran as energy...
Big Tech earnings test record stock market rally...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

Jack Smith appeals Judge Cannon decision to throw out Trump case

by admin August 27, 2024
August 27, 2024
Jack Smith appeals Judge Cannon decision to throw out Trump case

Special counsel Jack Smith filed his appeal Monday of U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon’s decision to dismiss Donald Trump’s classified documents indictment, a ruling the judge made after finding that Smith’s appointment exceeded his power as a government officer.

Cannon’s decision “conflicts with an otherwise unbroken course of decisions, including by the Supreme Court … and it is at odds with widespread and longstanding appointment practices in the Department of Justice and across the government,” Smith wrote in the appeal.

The July 15 ruling was a stunning rebuke to a historic set of charges, in which the former president was accused of repeatedly breaking the law by allegedly stashing classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago home and obstructing government efforts to retrieve them.

Smith had quickly vowed to appeal Cannon’s decision in the hopes of getting a higher court to revive the case against Trump. He filed his legal argument one day before the formal deadline set by the federal appeals court in Atlanta.

The court filing argues that the implications of Cannon’s decision could extend far beyond special counsel appointments to many other types of government officials.

“The district court’s rationale could jeopardize the longstanding operation of the Justice Department and call into question hundreds of appointments throughout the Executive Branch,” Smith wrote.

This is a developing story. It will be updated.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
Trump is overhyping another one of his favorite popularity metrics
next post
Environmental group calls for RFK Jr. to be investigated for reportedly sawing off whale head

You may also like

Protest march on DNC draws crowds but doesn’t...

August 22, 2024

JD Vance’s Marine buddies back his service over...

August 5, 2024

When voters consider gender, enthusiasm for Harris surges...

September 12, 2024

Trump’s N.Y. hush money sentencing delayed until after...

September 7, 2024

Hundreds of former Bush, McCain and Romney staffers...

August 27, 2024

Arizona’s top court says voters missing citizenship proof...

September 21, 2024

Harris holds slight national lead over Trump, Post-ABC-Ipsos...

August 18, 2024

Secret Service approves new plan for Trump to...

August 16, 2024

Harris slams Trump as ‘architect of this crisis’...

September 21, 2024

5 takeaways from the Democratic convention and Tim...

August 22, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Thermos recalls 8.2 million bottles after stoppers eject, causing injury and reported vision loss

      May 3, 2026
    • Build-A-Bear recalls roughly 36,000 Heart-Warming Hugs Bears

      May 3, 2026
    • Republican state attorneys general join lawsuit to stop $6.2B local TV merger

      May 2, 2026
    • Graphic: Track U.S. and state gas prices

      May 2, 2026
    • Could an ‘8647’ T-shirt get you in trouble?

      May 2, 2026
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (990)
    • Economy (839)
    • Investing (4,085)
    • Politics (747)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2026 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved