Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
CuFe Limited
Pacgold
Halcones Precious Metals Announces AGM Results
Lithium Universe LtdCompletes PV Solar Cell Recycling Acquisition
Completion of PV Solar Cell Recycling Acquisition
Lac Carheil MRE to Benefit from Exceptional Assay...
Project Update – Optimisation Underway Halleck Creek
3 Best-performing Canadian Cleantech Stocks of 2025
Trump says it’s ‘highly unlikely’ he will fire...
Rich Checkan: Gold, Silver Still “Dirt Cheap” —...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

When voters consider gender, enthusiasm for Harris surges — among women

by admin September 12, 2024
September 12, 2024
When voters consider gender, enthusiasm for Harris surges — among women

There are a number of reasons that conducting political polling is tricky. The one with which people are most familiar is that it’s not easy to contact respondents. (It is not the case, though, that pollsters rely on landline telephones to do so.) A more important consideration is that the results depend on the pollsters having a good sense of the electorate; that is, who’s likely to turn out to vote. That then informs how the results are weighted to be representative. So if the turnout model is off, the results will be, too.

Polling conducted well in advance of an election has another disadvantage: It’s hard to account for the effects of the campaign itself. Not just unpredictable elements but predictable ones, such as voters learning more about candidates’ backgrounds, biographies and priorities.

Or, say, voters considering the historic nature of a candidacy.

In August, The Washington Post looked at polling from Fairleigh Dickinson University that included a novel element, presenting poll respondents with subtle reminders about Vice President Kamala Harris’s race or gender before asking them their vote choice. Those who were given reminders were more likely to indicate that they preferred Harris.

Polling released this week by 19th News, conducted by SurveyMonkey, approached the issue slightly differently. That poll asked respondents whom they preferred, and found Harris with a three-percentage-point lead over former president Donald Trump. Then respondents were asked a follow-up question, measuring how enthusiastic they were about their votes.

Except Harris’s supporters were asked one of two different questions. Half were simply asked, “How excited are you to vote for Kamala Harris?” The other half were asked the same question, but with a lead-in: “Given that Kamala Harris will be the first woman to be president, how excited are you to be voting for her?”

In general, Harris supporters were slightly more likely than Trump supporters to say they were “very excited” to vote for their chosen candidate. When Harris’s gender was mentioned, though, there was a surge in enthusiasm for her — but only among women.

The size of the respondent poll allowed SurveyMonkey to break out a number of interesting and unusual demographic groups in its responses. It allows us to see, for example, that — in contrast to popular understanding — divorced men are less supportive of Trump (a four-point lead) than are married men (among whom Trump has a 12-point lead) or men overall (an eight-point lead).

It also allows us to see interesting differences in the shift in enthusiasm between Harris supporters who were (the end of the arrows below) and weren’t (the outlined circle) reminded of the history her election would make.

(Subgroups for which no data are shown were too small in number to warrant inclusion. There aren’t a lot of Democrats planning to vote for Trump, for example.)

The length of the arrows — the difference between those two groups — is not necessarily indicative of a huge shift. It may, instead, be a reflection of smaller groups having bigger margins of error, which happens in polling. But one can’t ignore that mentions of the history at stake had a broad effect on women that simply doesn’t appear with men.

As we noted with the Fairleigh Dickinson poll, this certainly doesn’t mean that Harris should predicate her appeals to voters on her gender. It may, however, be useful for the campaign to have targeted voices remind women of the history at stake as voting approaches.

Or, at least, that’s what this poll suggests at this point. And, as we know, polling is tricky.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
Trump won’t take Ukraine’s side. That’s far out of step with voters.
next post
Does Trump understand that ‘strongman’ isn’t a compliment?

You may also like

Senior staff members for N.C. gubernatorial hopeful Mark...

September 23, 2024

Ohio sheriff says to ‘write down’ addresses of...

September 17, 2024

Harris officially secures Democratic nomination for president

August 3, 2024

Trump campaign says it is victim of foreign...

August 11, 2024

Harris significantly outspending Trump on television, digital ads

September 28, 2024

Trump offers confusing plan to pay for U.S....

September 6, 2024

It’s getting worse for JD Vance

August 8, 2024

Trump says he saved Walz from protesters. Walz...

August 8, 2024

Trump flips stance on making voting easier after...

October 22, 2024

Their White House dreams on hold, Democratic hopefuls...

August 24, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • CuFe Limited

      July 18, 2025
    • Pacgold

      July 18, 2025
    • Halcones Precious Metals Announces AGM Results

      July 18, 2025
    • Lithium Universe LtdCompletes PV Solar Cell Recycling Acquisition

      July 18, 2025
    • Completion of PV Solar Cell Recycling Acquisition

      July 18, 2025
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (769)
    • Economy (829)
    • Investing (2,440)
    • Politics (737)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved