Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
NextSource Materials Announces Results of 2025 Annual Meeting...
Crypto Market Update: XRP and Solana ETFs Gain...
CoTec Investment MagIron Completes Purchase of Reynolds Pellet...
Prismo Metals Announces Closing of Private Placement
55 North Mining Appoints Wayne Parsons as Executive...
Zinc Stocks: 5 Biggest Canadian Companies in 2025
Rio Silver Inc. Completes Securities for Debt Transaction
Goldgroup Enters Into Agreement To Sell Subsidiary Minera...
SAGA Metals Completes Annual Work Program at North...
Prince Silver to Expand and Accelerate Drilling Program...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Business

California homeowners allege home insurance companies colluded to deny coverage

by admin April 24, 2025
April 24, 2025
California homeowners allege home insurance companies colluded to deny coverage

LOS ANGELES — A group of California homeowners is taking on insurance companies that they say illegally coordinated to deny coverage to fire-prone areas, leaving thousands of displaced residents drastically underinsured as they fight for funding to rebuild.

The homeowners, many of whom were affected by the recent wildfires that torched large swaths of Los Angeles, have filed a lawsuit alleging that California insurance companies colluded in a “nefarious conspiracy” to shut out high-risk homeowners from the insurance market.

The complaint, filed Friday in Los Angeles County, accuses dozens of major insurance companies and their subsidiaries of collaborating in a “group boycott” of certain areas to eliminate competition and force homeowners toward the state’s insurer of last resort, a program known as the California FAIR Plan.

The lawsuits name California’s largest home insurers, including State Farm, Farmers, Berkshire Hathaway, Allstate and Liberty Mutual. None of them have provided a comment on the allegations.

The FAIR Plan has its own reserves and is intended to provide basic insurance to residents who cannot find a policy through the private marketplace. While it was created by the governor and the Legislature, and the state’s insurance commissioner has oversight, it is not a public program. The insurance companies named in the lawsuit jointly own and operate the FAIR plan, offering terms that limit their risk and place a higher burden on policyholders.

“They knew that they could force people, by dropping insurance, into that plan which had higher premiums and far lower coverages,” Robert Ruyak, an attorney with Larson LLP, the law firm that brought the complaint, said. “They realized that they could take this device, which is to protect consumers, and turn it into something that protected them.”

Ruyak argues the insurance companies knew they could limit their liability by directing policyholders onto the FAIR Plan, which allows companies to recoup up to half of their losses through premium increases, by agreeing that no company would insure high-risk areas.

“All of these insurance companies participate in the California FAIR Plan. They own it and manage it. It is not a California entity, it is not even a separate entity … the only way this scheme would work is if no one would pick up a dropped policy at any price, on any terms. And that’s what happened.”

Millions of U.S. homeowners have in recent years struggled to buy property insurance as companies have increasingly declined to offer coverage to people who live in high-risk areas, particularly as climate change has supercharged some natural disasters. An NBC News analysis in 2023 found that a quarter of all U.S. homes may be at risk of a climate-induced insurance shock.

California has been among the hardest hit by what some have called an “insurance crisis.” The state’s FAIR Plan, meanwhile, has been the subject of growing scrutiny and frustration from insurance regulators and customers.

The plaintiffs are asking for a jury trial and seeking payment for three times their damages. 

A separate class-action lawsuit filed Friday makes similar allegations.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

previous post
Inside the $1 billion berry startup backed by Ray Dalio’s family office
next post
Starbucks imposes new limits on what baristas can wear under their green aprons

You may also like

White House accuses Powell of mismanaging Federal Reserve,...

July 11, 2025

Boeing machinists reject new labor contract, extending strike

October 25, 2024

Chipotle downplays looming Trump tariffs, says only half...

February 7, 2025

JPMorgan marks 1,000th branch opening since 2018 expansion...

August 2, 2025

Microsoft to cut 3% of its workforce

May 14, 2025

Paramount acquires Bari Weiss’ The Free Press, naming...

October 8, 2025

NFL season expected to spur record $35 billion...

September 5, 2024

Nvidia’s CEO did a Q&A with analysts. What...

March 27, 2025

Klarna, nearing IPO, plucks lucrative Walmart fintech partnership...

March 19, 2025

Walmart will likely raise some prices if Trump...

November 20, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • NextSource Materials Announces Results of 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

      January 1, 2026
    • Crypto Market Update: XRP and Solana ETFs Gain as Bitcoin, Ether Continue to Bleed

      January 1, 2026
    • CoTec Investment MagIron Completes Purchase of Reynolds Pellet Plant

      January 1, 2026
    • Prismo Metals Announces Closing of Private Placement

      January 1, 2026
    • 55 North Mining Appoints Wayne Parsons as Executive Chair; Strengthens Leadership as the Company Advances the Last Hope Gold Project

      January 1, 2026
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (916)
    • Economy (829)
    • Investing (3,556)
    • Politics (737)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved