Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
Lithium Americas and GM Advance Thacker Pass with...
Gold Price Closes in on US$3,900 as US...
Altech Batteries LtdCommences Selling Sodium Nickel Chloride Batteries
Mustang Energy and Skyharbour Resources Stake an Additional...
Apex Announces Update on Financing
Syntheia Closes Call Center Guys Acquisition
Gold’s Meteoric Rise: Can the Price Break US$4,000...
COB: Repayment of Promissory Note
Lo Herma Resource Drilling Timing Confirmed
Ben & Jerry’s co-founder resigns, claiming parent company...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

Georgia judge blocks array of rules approved by pro-Trump election board

by admin October 17, 2024
October 17, 2024
Georgia judge blocks array of rules approved by pro-Trump election board

A Georgia judge on Wednesday blocked a series of rules approved this year by a pro-Trump majority of the state’s election board, admonishing the board in stinging language that the rules are “ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VOID.”

The judge struck down more than a half-dozen new rules, including one that allowed county election officials to launch investigations of irregularities, which critics feared would delay certification.

Democrats and voting rights groups had sued to block the board’s decisions, arguing that they were being imposed too close to the election and would be impossible to implement without causing disruptions in the election process. The decision came on the second day of early voting in Georgia, with day one setting records for turnout.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thomas A. Cox Jr. also voided a rule that would have mandated the hand-counting of ballots, a decision that mirrored one by a different Fulton County judge, Robert McBurney, on Tuesday.

On Monday, McBurney had ruled that county election boards do not have discretion to withhold certification of results. All of the rulings apply statewide.

Members of the board’s majority have defended the rules, saying they were intended to make state elections more secure and transparent. The flurry of rulemaking, which occurred in recent weeks and months, was the work of a new right-wing majority that took control of the board in May with an avowed mission of preventing fraud and other irregularities from tainting the presidential result this year.

The three board members — Janice Johnston, Janelle King and Rick Jeffares — did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Former president Donald Trump had lauded the three by name at a rally in Georgia this summer, calling them “pit bulls fighting for honesty, transparency and victory.”

Critics said the board had effectively legislated new law, something that existing statute does not empower it to do. The judge agreed.

“We won,” said Scot Turner, who leads Eternal Vigilance Action, the nonpartisan issue-advocacy organization that brought the suit. “This is a victory for the Constitution and the principle of separation of powers. Every conservative should see this as a win and significant pushback on an unelected board making law.”

Other rules voided by Cox would have imposed new identification standards on people dropping off absentee ballots for loved ones and increased reporting standards for counties about their absentee ballot receipts. The judge also negated a potentially burdensome requirement to provide to any county board members “all election related documentation created during the conduct of elections” if they have questions about the accuracy or integrity of the result.

The new rules “are contrary to the laws of the State of Georgia, the Constitution of the State of Georgia, and the Constitution of the United States,” Cox wrote in his order, and the State Election Board “had no authority to implement” them.

The ruling is a victory for voting-rights advocates as well as Democratic groups, including the campaign of Vice President Kamala Harris, which had protested the new rules. They were approved by three conservative members of the state board, all supporters of Donald Trump, and over the objections of the other two board members.

In his decision, Cox ordered the rules to be immediately voided and for all county election officials to be informed that the rules are not to be enforced.

It’s not clear if the board will appeal the decision. The office of Attorney General Chris Carr (R) represents the board and had advised it against acting on several of the rules that were struck down Wednesday.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
San Francisco takes on the EPA in a case about poop and a $10 billion fine
next post
Ethel Kennedy’s memorial attracts 3 presidents — and tales of an older era

You may also like

Of course JD Vance knows Donald Trump lost...

October 18, 2024

At long last, President Joe Biden passes the...

August 20, 2024

Harris’s own ballot will include crime measure dividing...

October 7, 2024

Trump campaign says it is victim of foreign...

August 11, 2024

Harris team quietly courts big-name GOP endorsements

September 30, 2024

Trump compares his Jan. 6 crowd to the...

August 9, 2024

He helped impeach Trump. On the campaign trail,...

October 20, 2024

Kamala Harris has moved the polls, but she...

September 23, 2024

Four people charged with murder after restraining man...

August 7, 2024

Trump’s false claim about Haitian immigrants eating pets...

September 15, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Lithium Americas and GM Advance Thacker Pass with Landmark Federal Funding

      October 2, 2025
    • Gold Price Closes in on US$3,900 as US Government Shuts Down

      October 2, 2025
    • Altech Batteries LtdCommences Selling Sodium Nickel Chloride Batteries

      October 2, 2025
    • Mustang Energy and Skyharbour Resources Stake an Additional Claim on its 914W Uranium Project

      October 2, 2025
    • Apex Announces Update on Financing

      October 2, 2025
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (879)
    • Economy (829)
    • Investing (2,940)
    • Politics (737)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved