Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
Terra Clean Energy
Terra Clean Energy: Advancing an Expansive Uranium Landholding...
Zijin Mining to Acquire Major Kazakh Gold Mine...
Equity Metals
South Harz Potash Limited
Ian Rodger Appointed Managing Director
Mali Completes Takeover of Abandoned Gold Mines, Extends...
13 Uranium Companies Exploring Canada’s Athabasca Basin
Crypto Market Recap: Metaplanet Buys 1,005 Bitcoin, REX...
Microsoft says goodbye to the Windows blue screen...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

Trump suggests he’s open to revoking access to abortion pill

by admin August 9, 2024
August 9, 2024
Trump suggests he’s open to revoking access to abortion pill

Donald Trump suggested in a news conference Thursday that he is open to curbing access to abortion pills through federal regulations, declining to rule out a sweeping move that some antiabortion allies have advocated.

Trump has previously praised a Supreme Court ruling that maintained access to the key abortion drug mifepristone, saying, “I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it.” But the GOP presidential nominee muddled his position at Thursday’s news conference at his Mar-a-Lago Club.

A reporter noted that there are ways the federal government could restrict abortion besides a national ban and asked if Trump would direct his Food and Drug Administration to “revoke access” to mifepristone. Trump did not reject the idea.

“Sure, you could, you could do things that will be, would, would supplement,” the GOP presidential nominee said. “Absolutely. … But you have to be able to have a vote, and all I want to do is give everybody a vote.” (Trump has defended his appointments of Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade by saying that the decision allowed states and voters to weigh in on the issue.)

Mifepristone is part of a two-drug regimen to end a pregnancy through the first 10 weeks of gestation. Most abortions in the United States are now carried out via medication, and curbing access to mifepristone would be hugely consequential.

Trump’s comments on Thursday could undercut his efforts to distance himself from the hardest-line abortion opponents in his party. He previously rebuffed activists’ pressure to campaign on a national restriction, framing it as a states’ issue, and supported a new GOP platform that angered some antiabortion activists. Trump’s campaign did not immediately respond to a request to clarify his position on mifepristone. Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign has made abortion access a central campaign issue and immediately highlighted Trump’s Thursday comments.

Some antiabortion activists have long argued that the federal government’s decades-ago approval of mifepristone was flawed and should be revoked, but such a move would face legal hurdles. Antiabortion groups also say the FDA could place restrictions on the medication — for instance, by reinstating a requirement that patients obtain them in person rather than through the mail.

Trump has sent mixed signals on abortion policy throughout his campaign. During his debate this summer with President Joe Biden, Trump was asked if he would “block abortion medication.”

“First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it,” Trump said.

The court had actually declined to limit access, siding with the Biden administration and manufacturer of mifepristone on the grounds that the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue over the issue.

In his Thursday news conference, Trump continued his response to the mifepristone question by saying, “There are many things on a humane basis that you can do outside of that, but you also have to give a vote, and the people are going to have to decide.”

Trump, a Florida resident, also declined to say how he would vote on a ballot measure that seeks to override the state’s ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy.

“I think the abortion issue has been very much tempered down,” he said. “I answered, I think, very well in the debate, and it seems to be much less of an issue.”

Michael Scherer and Isaac Arnsdorf contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
Tim Walz: The Rahm Emanuel Democrat who became a Nancy Pelosi Democrat
next post
With Harris and Walz in, some Democrats still weigh skipping the polls

You may also like

Number of Arizona voters missing citizenship proof doubles

October 1, 2024

Both Harris, Trump late on transition plans despite...

August 31, 2024

Former Colorado official found guilty for role in...

August 13, 2024

Court may decide if Arizonans with missing citizenship...

September 18, 2024

Trump says Ukraine’s Zelensky should ‘never have let...

October 18, 2024

5 key revelations from Bob Woodward’s new book

October 9, 2024

More Americans see Harris than Trump as very...

October 11, 2024

Harris, Walz tour southern Georgia by bus, chasing...

August 29, 2024

Fact-checking Day 3 of the 2024 Democratic National...

August 22, 2024

In Biden’s hometown, Trump reminisces about his former...

October 10, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Terra Clean Energy

      July 1, 2025
    • Terra Clean Energy: Advancing an Expansive Uranium Landholding in the Prolific Athabasca Basin

      July 1, 2025
    • Zijin Mining to Acquire Major Kazakh Gold Mine for US$1.2 Billion

      July 1, 2025
    • Equity Metals

      July 1, 2025
    • South Harz Potash Limited

      July 1, 2025
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (748)
    • Economy (829)
    • Investing (2,313)
    • Politics (737)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved