Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
PDAC 2026: Canada Doubles Down on Mining as...
Rick Rule: Gold Price During War, Silver Strategy,...
LITHIUM AFRICA CORP. ANNOUNCES UPSIZE IN PRIVATE PLACEMENT...
Alvopetro Announces February 2026 Sales Volumes
Chen Lin: Key Silver Date to Watch, My...
Lobo Tiggre: Gold, Oil in Times of War,...
Prismo Metals Closes Strategic Transaction with Blade Resources
Oreterra Metals
Oreterra Metals: Close on the Trail of a...
WPIC: Platinum Market Heading for Fourth Straight Deficit...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

It’s getting worse for JD Vance

by admin August 8, 2024
August 8, 2024
It’s getting worse for JD Vance

Two weeks ago, I noted that the early signs for JD Vance as Donald Trump’s vice-presidential nominee were not encouraging. He was a historically unpopular running mate. The polls seemed to confirm what was already evident: He wasn’t a particularly voter-friendly pick, dating back to an underperforming 2022 Ohio Senate campaign in which every other Republican running for statewide office did better in their races.

The signs since then have only gotten worse.

A half-dozen polls have now tested views of Vance more than once in the last few weeks. In each of them, his already-underwhelming image ratings have deteriorated — sometimes significantly.

And crucially, his struggles appear particularly pronounced among educated voters and women. That would suggest that his derisive past comments about childless women are indeed proving to be liabilities.

But first, the big picture. Vance’s net favorable rating (favorable vs. unfavorable) is now nine points underwater in the FiveThirtyEight average. That’s a marked contrast to other recent running mates, who have generally polled in popular territory.

And notably, three of the repeated polls show about as many people view Vance very unfavorably as have any kind of positive view of him.

His net favorable ratings have dropped:

  • Three points in Reuters-Ipsos polls between July 16 and July 28 (the end dates for the polls).
  • Five points in Economist-YouGov polls between July 23 and July 30.
  • Eight points in AP-NORC polls between July 15 and July 29.
  • Nine points in other YouGov polls (that weren’t sponsored by a media outlet) between July 15 and July 25.
  • Nine points in ABC News-Ipsos polls between July 20 and July 27.
  • And six points in a new NPR/PBS/Marist College poll, versus its July 22 poll.

Digging into specific groups can be problematic, because they involve smaller sample sizes with bigger margins of error. And not all polls provide such detail — at least publicly. But the story of Vance’s decline is similar across these polls.

Vance’s net favorable rating has declined among women by around 10 points in each of the Marist, Economist-YouGov and other YouGov polls.

He’s declined among independents by double digits in both the Marist and YouGov polls. (Though he ticked up slightly in the Economist-YouGov poll.)

He’s declined at least 19 points among Black voters in the Marist, YouGov and Economist-YouGov polls. And he’s also down double digits among voters under 30 in two of those three polls.

In the Marist poll — the most recent and detailed high-quality survey we have — Vance’s net image has declined by 28 points among college-educated voters and 14 points among women who are political independents.

Vance’s numbers overall and with many of these groups are now similar to Trump’s. That might make logical sense given the two are on the same ticket. But in the recent past, even running mates of unpopular nominees have generally been popular — including Mike Pence in 2020, and both Pence and Tim Kaine in 2016.

Vance isn’t getting that same benefit of the doubt. Instead, his status as a historically unpopular running mate appears to be cementing.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
Assessing the ‘eliteness’ of the major-party presidential tickets
next post
Trump says he saved Walz from protesters. Walz says Trump sent them.

You may also like

No amount of evidence will convince Republicans of...

October 4, 2024

Who said it: Trump or Harris?

August 24, 2024

FBI identifies no motive or foreign links in...

August 29, 2024

Arizona grand jurors discussed indicting Trump, but prosecutors...

August 7, 2024

Congress didn’t recognize a race riot. Biden will...

August 14, 2024

Trump to meet Zelensky, opening new chapter in...

September 28, 2024

Man arrested outside Trump event in Calif. over...

October 14, 2024

Trump floats ‘one really violent day’ for police...

October 1, 2024

More Republicans expect election ‘fraud’ in minority areas...

October 15, 2024

Gateway Pundit settles with Georgia election workers in...

October 11, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • PDAC 2026: Canada Doubles Down on Mining as Investment Attractiveness Score Peaks

      March 6, 2026
    • Rick Rule: Gold Price During War, Silver Strategy, Oil Stock Game Plan

      March 6, 2026
    • LITHIUM AFRICA CORP. ANNOUNCES UPSIZE IN PRIVATE PLACEMENT TO C$8.5M WITH LEAD ORDER FROM PURPOSE GLOBAL RESOURCE FUND

      March 6, 2026
    • Alvopetro Announces February 2026 Sales Volumes

      March 6, 2026
    • Chen Lin: Key Silver Date to Watch, My Favorite 2026 Commodities

      March 6, 2026
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (942)
    • Economy (839)
    • Investing (4,041)
    • Politics (747)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2026 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved