Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
Lithium Americas and GM Advance Thacker Pass with...
Gold Price Closes in on US$3,900 as US...
Altech Batteries LtdCommences Selling Sodium Nickel Chloride Batteries
Mustang Energy and Skyharbour Resources Stake an Additional...
Apex Announces Update on Financing
Syntheia Closes Call Center Guys Acquisition
Gold’s Meteoric Rise: Can the Price Break US$4,000...
COB: Repayment of Promissory Note
Lo Herma Resource Drilling Timing Confirmed
Ben & Jerry’s co-founder resigns, claiming parent company...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Business

Lululemon sues Costco over selling alleged dupes

by admin July 2, 2025
July 2, 2025
Lululemon sues Costco over selling alleged dupes

Love your Costco dupes? Lululemon is coming after them.

Lululemon has filed a lawsuit against Costco, accusing the big box store of selling knockoffs of the athleisure brand’s apparel for a fraction of the price.

According to the complaint filed Friday in the Central District of California, Costco allegedly ‘unlawfully traded’ on Lululemon’s ‘reputation, goodwill and sweat equity’ by selling unauthorized and unlicensed knockoffs and dupes, infringing on the company’s popular patents.

The complaint lists several Costco items that appear to rip off Lululemon’s designs and patents: Costco’s ‘Danskin Half-Zip Pullover’ that retails for just $8. The lawsuit claims it’s a dupe for Lululemon’s SCUBA pullover that sells for $118. Costco’s ‘Jockey Ladies Yoga Jacket’ and ‘Spyder Women’s Yoga Jacket,’ which sell for $22, appear to be a dupe of Lululemon’s DEFINE jacket with a price tag of $128. The ‘Kirkland 5 Pocket Performance Pant,’ sold online for $10, is a dupe for Lululemon’s $128 ABC Pant, the complaint contended.

The lawsuit alleged trade dress infringement, unfair competition under the Lanham Act, patent infringement, and violation of the California Unfair Business Practices Act.

Lululemon seeks to recover monetary damages from lost profits, claiming it suffered ‘significant harm’ to its brands and reputation.

Dupes have surged in popularity, fueled by social media and young people seeking trendy, high-quality clothing without breaking the bank. The suit noted that hashtags like ‘LululemonDupes’ have trended on social media platforms like TikTok, with influencers promoting ‘these copycat products.’

Lululemon, based in Vancouver, acknowledged some companies have replicated its proprietary apparel designs and sold them as ‘dupes.’ The company said it has sent cease and desist letters to such companies, including Costco.

Specifically, the suit claimed Costco sells dupes of Lululemon’s popular SCUBA, DEFINE, and ABC lines, ‘which have earned substantial fame and considerable goodwill among the public.’

Costco allegedly profited off confusion and allowed customers to believe the products are authentic, the lawsuit claimed.

The suit said Costco is known to use manufacturers of popular branded products for its own Kirkland label products.

‘This source ambiguity preconditions at least some consumers into believing that private label, Kirkland-branded dupes are in fact manufactured by the authentic suppliers of the ‘original’ products. Defendant does not dispel this ambiguity,’ the complaint said.

In November, Lululemon wrote to Costco about the infringement, and Costco subsequently removed at least some of the products that infringed Lululemon’s SCUBA mark, but later began selling the Hi-Tec Men’s Scuba full zip, the complaint said.

The suit seeks a jury trial and for the court to order Costco to pay Lululemon damages in the form of lost profits, an order to permanently restrain Costco from making or selling more dupes, and an order to remove any ads or posts displaying the infringing products.

Costco did not immediately respond to NBC News’ request for comment on Tuesday.

Lululemon said in a statement that ‘as an innovation-led company that invests significantly in the research, development, and design of our products, we take the responsibility of protecting and enforcing our intellectual property rights very seriously and pursue the appropriate legal action when necessary.’

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

previous post
Terra Clean Energy
next post
Clean energy stocks fall as Trump bill would tax components from China, phase out credits

You may also like

Court rejects Boeing plea deal tied to 737...

December 7, 2024

Apple just landed a key win for the...

August 21, 2025

AMC is poised to ride the box office...

November 19, 2024

Philip Morris to invest $232 million to expand...

August 30, 2024

Stocks close higher, clawing back some losses from...

August 12, 2024

Reddit targets international users for ad growth, teases...

November 28, 2024

Streaming overtakes cable and broadcast as the most-watched...

June 19, 2025

Starbucks shakes up its leadership again, adding two...

January 30, 2025

CVS is under pressure and considering a breakup....

October 7, 2024

Dick’s Sporting Goods is latest retailer to forecast...

March 12, 2025

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Lithium Americas and GM Advance Thacker Pass with Landmark Federal Funding

      October 2, 2025
    • Gold Price Closes in on US$3,900 as US Government Shuts Down

      October 2, 2025
    • Altech Batteries LtdCommences Selling Sodium Nickel Chloride Batteries

      October 2, 2025
    • Mustang Energy and Skyharbour Resources Stake an Additional Claim on its 914W Uranium Project

      October 2, 2025
    • Apex Announces Update on Financing

      October 2, 2025
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (879)
    • Economy (829)
    • Investing (2,940)
    • Politics (737)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved