Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
Chemical assay confirms high-grade uranium
How to Invest in Manganese Stocks
$14M Placement to Fund Acquisition & Exploration
Green Technology Metals
Laramide Identifies Targets for 15,000 Meter Drill Program...
Coinbase Expands USDC Rewards to Canada
NVIDIA Facing Weak Demand for New Chip as...
Newmont Withdraws from Mount Coolon Joint Venture, GBM...
LimeWire acquires Fyre Festival, asking ‘What Could Possibly...
Gold Market Dynamics Shifting as China-US Trade Tensions...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

Trump proposals could drain Social Security in 6 years, budget group says

by admin October 21, 2024
October 21, 2024
Trump proposals could drain Social Security in 6 years, budget group says

A new report projects that the Social Security Trust Fund might run out of money within six years under a Donald Trump presidency, while Vice President Kamala Harris’s proposed policies would not meaningfully change the current trajectory.

Social Security faces a looming funding crisis in an aging country, with trustees most recently predicting that the retirement and disability program’s trust fund will become insolvent in 2035. Many of Trump’s campaign proposals would accelerate that timeline, potentially by years, said the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan group that opposes large federal deficits.

In a report released Monday, the organization concluded that many of Trump’s proposed second-term agenda items all work in the same direction when it comes to the Social Security Trust Fund. The budget group did not produce a similar report on Harris’s policies because they would have a negligible effect measured only in weeks or months rather than years, said Marc Goldwein, CRFB’s senior policy director.

Compared to prior presidential campaigns, Goldwein said, “I can’t think of anything that would be this order of magnitude” in its detrimental effect on Social Security’s bottom line compared to the policies Trump has proposed.

Most directly, Trump has promised that no Social Security recipients should have to pay federal income taxes on their benefits. Under current law, 40 percent of beneficiaries pay taxes on some portion of their Social Security. The tax they pay on their benefits goes directly back to the trust fund, and getting rid of it could cost the program almost $1 trillion over 10 years, the report forecast.

Other Trump policies might have indirect effects. Trump’s pledge to deport millions of undocumented workers could cost the trust fund hundreds of millions of dollars, the CRFB said. Many undocumented immigrants have payroll taxes taken out of their paychecks for the Social Security Trust Fund, but never become eligible to claim benefits, so they are a net positive for the program.

Trump’s proposed high tariffs on all imports could affect the economy in several ways detrimental to Social Security’s financial health, CRFB said. If the tariffs drive high inflation as projected by Wall Street experts, Social Security will have to pay out more in benefits because of automatic cost-of-living adjustments based on inflation.

The report also pointed to Trump’s promises not to tax tip income or income earned during overtime hours. Trump has not clarified whether he means to exempt them from federal income taxes only or also from taxes that fund Social Security and Medicare. If he means the latter, that could cost Social Security $150 million to more than $1 trillion over a decade, with the likely outcome on the very high end of that range, CRFB said.

All added up, the report forecasts that Social Security under Trump would hit the point where by law it must cut benefits in 2031 or 2032. And unless Congress changes the law that triggers the automatic cuts, the size of the cut to benefits would rise, from a current projection of a 23 percent reduction for all Social Security checks to a predicted cut of about 33 percent.

Both Trump and Harris have said they aim to protect Social Security to prevent cuts if elected, but neither candidate has offered a comprehensive plan to plug the current projected gap. Stabilizing the trust fund will require either raising more money or spending less money in some way, or a combination of the two.

Trump has talked of raising more money by drilling for oil on federal lands and has claimed that undocumented immigrants receiving benefits has led to Social Security’s problems, a view rejected by experts who point out that immigrants pay more into the program than they receive.

Harris supports a plan to raise some of the money by imposing payroll taxes on income above $400,000; currently, workers stop paying Social Security taxes after their first $168,000 in annual income.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
Taroom Gas Infrastructure MOU Signed with AGIG
next post
Harris has a huge cash advantage over Trump, but polls remain tight

You may also like

After fiery debate, Harris and Trump camps wrangle...

September 12, 2024

Strikes on Hamas, Hezbollah leaders ‘don’t help’ cease-fire...

August 1, 2024

How The Washington Post creates its presidential polling...

October 4, 2024

Biden, in rare appearance since stepping aside, touts...

August 14, 2024

Trump pledges to jail opponents, baselessly suggests election...

September 9, 2024

From democracy to freedom: How Kamala Harris shifted...

August 21, 2024

Mark Meadows tries to move his Arizona case...

August 16, 2024

Georgia school shooting elevates gun violence as issue...

September 6, 2024

GOP probe of Biden’s Afghanistan exit expands as...

September 8, 2024

Trump’s ‘concepts of a plan’ fumble is even...

September 13, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Chemical assay confirms high-grade uranium

      September 17, 2025
    • How to Invest in Manganese Stocks

      September 17, 2025
    • $14M Placement to Fund Acquisition & Exploration

      September 17, 2025
    • Green Technology Metals

      September 17, 2025
    • Laramide Identifies Targets for 15,000 Meter Drill Program at Kazakhstan Uranium Project

      September 17, 2025
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (856)
    • Economy (829)
    • Investing (2,834)
    • Politics (737)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved