Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
Thermos recalls 8.2 million bottles after stoppers eject,...
Build-A-Bear recalls roughly 36,000 Heart-Warming Hugs Bears
Republican state attorneys general join lawsuit to stop...
Graphic: Track U.S. and state gas prices
Could an ‘8647’ T-shirt get you in trouble?
Companies must now quickly respond to stalking warrants...
Trump signs executive order expanding access to retirement...
FCC head says agency wasn’t pressured to order...
Trump briefed on options for Iran as energy...
Big Tech earnings test record stock market rally...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

In new interview, Vance repeatedly declines to admit Trump lost 2020 election

by admin October 12, 2024
October 12, 2024
In new interview, Vance repeatedly declines to admit Trump lost 2020 election

Sen. JD Vance, the running mate of former president Donald Trump, repeatedly declined to acknowledge in a new interview that Trump lost the 2020 election, an issue that has dogged the Ohio Republican in the closing weeks of the presidential race.

In the interview with the New York Times, Vance was given five opportunities to acknowledge that Trump did not win in 2020, according to the Times. He refused to say so, insisting that he is “focused on the future” and criticizing an “obsession here with focusing on 2020.”

The conversation with Vance was taped for “The Interview,” a Times podcast that comes out every Saturday.

As the host, Lulu Garcia-Navarro, pressed Vance on the 2020 election, he countered with his own question, asking her whether “big technology companies” censored information that could have swayed the outcome. He was referring to a decision by Twitter that temporarily blocked users from sharing a story about Hunter Biden’s laptop.

“I’ve answered your question with another question,” Vance said at one point. “You answer my question, and I’ll answer yours.”

Trump’s refusal to admit his reelection defeat has returned to the political spotlight in recent weeks. Vance declined to say Trump lost during his Oct. 1 debate with the Democratic vice-presidential candidate, Tim Walz. The Minnesota governor said onstage that Vance delivered a “damning non-answer.”

The Democratic National Committee pounced Friday on the excerpt of the Times interview.

“With five more dodges, JD Vance has proven five more times that he will always put Donald Trump’s dangerous election conspiracy theories ahead of our Constitution and the rule of law,” Alex Floyd, a DNC spokesman, said in a statement.

In the Times interview, Vance also said he “would have voted against certification” in 2020, suggesting he would have joined the eight GOP senators and 139 House members who voted to object to the results in certain states. The Senate vote took place in January 2021, two years before Vance arrived in the chamber.

Vance has said before that if he were vice president after the 2020 election, he would have asked states to provide “multiple slates of electors, and I think the U.S. Congress should have fought over it from there.” The Constitution gives the states the power to pick their electors, and the vice president has no role in their selection.

Former vice president Mike Pence refused to bow to Trump’s pressure to block certification of his reelection loss, leading to a rupture in their relationship. Pence is not supporting Trump’s comeback campaign, and Trump said in a podcast interview released Wednesday that Pence “couldn’t cross the line of doing what was right.”

The presidential campaign of Vice President Kamala Harris invoked Pence on Friday as it responded to Vance’s new interview.

“Donald Trump chose JD Vance to be his running mate for one reason and one reason only: He will do what Mike Pence wouldn’t and put Donald Trump over our Constitution,” Harris campaign spokeswoman Sarafina Chitika said in a statement.

Trump remains under federal indictment for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. A court filing unsealed last week provided explosive new details that portrayed Trump as indifferent while his supporters stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Harris has elevated the issue in her campaign with less than a month left in the race. She campaigned in Wisconsin last week with Liz Cheney, the former GOP congresswoman who voted to impeach Trump over the Jan. 6 attack and later helped lead a House committee that investigated it.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
Motivation to vote surged among women after Harris became the nominee
next post
Things are looking up for JD Vance

You may also like

Harris significantly outspending Trump on television, digital ads

September 28, 2024

Vance suggests the left stole 2020 … by...

October 12, 2024

Trump rants, resurfaces sexual assault allegations for 49...

September 7, 2024

How The Washington Post creates its presidential polling...

October 4, 2024

Trump downplays U.S. troop injuries in 2020 Iranian...

October 2, 2024

Americans expect Harris to boost women … and...

September 27, 2024

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tried to meet with...

August 15, 2024

Barack Obama raises $4 million for Harris at...

September 22, 2024

Vance used past GOP climate inaction to argue...

October 3, 2024

Harris will visit border amid political fight over...

September 28, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Thermos recalls 8.2 million bottles after stoppers eject, causing injury and reported vision loss

      May 3, 2026
    • Build-A-Bear recalls roughly 36,000 Heart-Warming Hugs Bears

      May 3, 2026
    • Republican state attorneys general join lawsuit to stop $6.2B local TV merger

      May 2, 2026
    • Graphic: Track U.S. and state gas prices

      May 2, 2026
    • Could an ‘8647’ T-shirt get you in trouble?

      May 2, 2026
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (990)
    • Economy (839)
    • Investing (4,085)
    • Politics (747)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2026 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved