Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
Blackrock Silver to Present at the Precious Metals...
Saga Metals Acknowledges U.S. Strategic Critical Minerals Reserve...
After Major Gold Payout, Bian Ximing Turns Bearish...
Equity Metals Exhibiting at the 2026 PDAC
African Discovery Groupannounces signing of Definitive Sales and...
Crypto Market Update: Bitcoin Price Ends Week Higher...
Tech Weekly: Chip Stocks Pop to Close Volatile...
Top 5 Canadian Mining Stocks This Week: Giant...
Editor’s Picks: Is Gold and Silver’s Price Correction...
Beyond the Pilot: Wiring Wall Street’s New Internet
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

Trump’s continued callousness toward injured soldiers

by admin October 3, 2024
October 3, 2024
Trump’s continued callousness toward injured soldiers

Donald Trump’s campaign has made great pains to combat the narrative that Trump repeatedly denigrated dead and injured soldiers.

Donald Trump himself keeps saying and doing callous things regarding dead and injured soldiers that make that much more difficult.

Democrats in the 2024 race have focused extensively on reported comments — confirmed last year by Trump’s former chief of staff, John F. Kelly — in which Trump referred to dead soldiers as “suckers” and questioned why people would join the military. The reported comments are hardly the only examples of Trump saying off-color things on the subject, but they are the most pronounced.

Still, even as that particular dispute has simmered, Trump keeps breathing life into the same narrative.

In mid-August, Trump called the Presidential Medal of Freedom, which is awarded to civilians, “much better” than the Presidential Medal of Honor. He said that was because the latter is awarded to soldiers who are “either in very bad shape because they’ve been hit so many times by bullets or they’re dead.”

(The Veterans of Foreign Wars and other veterans groups denounced the comments as crassly minimizing the sacrifices of soldiers.)

Later that month, Trump campaign staffers got into an altercation with a staff member at Arlington National Cemetery who tried to stop them from holding a Trump photo op in a highly restricted area of the cemetery — a photo op that appeared to run afoul of federal law. At least one family whose loved one’s gravesite was featured in a Trump campaign video of the event objected.

And on Tuesday came another significant entry: Trump downplaying the traumatic brain injuries suffered by more than 100 U.S. soldiers in a 2020 Iranian missile attack as mere “headaches,” when they were clearly much more than that.

The event Trump was talking about was Iran’s strike on Ain al-Asad air base in Iraq — an attack that followed the Trump-ordered killing of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani.

It’s not the first time Trump has downplayed these injuries; he said much the same thing shortly after Iran’s strike. But Trump’s new comments come in a much different context, and with much more known about the very real severity of the injuries.

Trump initially claimed on Jan. 8, 2020, that there were “no Americans harmed,” a claim that soon proved false. As the numbers diagnosed with traumatic brain injuries gradually grew, he shifted to insisting that the injuries were “not very serious.”

“I heard they had headaches and a couple of other things,” Trump said on Jan. 22.

These comments also drew criticism from the VFW.

It was evident at the time that Trump had a political and strategic interest in downplaying the toll of Iran’s strike. He had just days before promised to launch massive strikes against Iran if it “strikes any Americans, or American assets.” Trump said even “Iran itself, WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD.” Despite Iran’s clearly striking an American asset and injuring U.S. soldiers, Trump did not retaliate. And minimizing Iran’s strike made it look as though Iran was afraid of too much escalation.

Not only does that strategic interest not really apply anymore, but we’ve also learned plenty in the years since the attack that makes clear the injuries went well beyond “headaches.”

Trump’s 2020 comments came before the extent of those injuries was fully appreciated; the number rose to 34 in January and then to more than 100 the next month. And some involved later reported majorly debilitating symptoms — along with the possible politicization of their cases.

CBS News in November 2021 highlighted a few of the cases:

  • “The person I was prior to a traumatic brain injury, he’s gone,” Platoon Sergeant Daine Kvasager said. “There’s parts that remain. The pieces are all still there, just — yeah, he’s not coming back.”
  • Intelligence officer Hailey Webster said she was forced to retire from the Army because of her injuries, saying her “brain still works but it doesn’t have any stamina, and it very frequently just stops working.”
  • Mike Pridgeon said he still suffered from constant headaches, memory loss and vision issues, adding: “My wife will say I used to be so articulate, but now I’m almost like a stroke patient.”
  • Another victim, Jason Quitugua, died by suicide in 2021. “He struggled, you know, like we all are, like I am,” Kvasager said of Quitugua.

A 2023 academic study of 35 of the traumatic brain injury cases found more than half experienced “post-traumatic amnesia.” Two of the patients underwent “several weeks of intense outpatient” rehabilitation.

That CBS piece highlighted the struggles of some of the soldiers to obtain Purple Hearts and the lifelong medical benefits that come with the award. The soldiers and others involved in the effort said it was at times thwarted for fear of escalation with Iran and undercutting Trump.

Trump to this day has an interest in downplaying Iran’s strike — politically, at least. It came on his watch, and he didn’t retaliate, despite his threat. He has minimized the strike in other ways in recent years, including falsely claiming Iran deliberately missed its target.

But downplaying the injuries comes with a cost to those who suffered them. And just as it has been on several occasions before, that seems to be a price Trump is willing to pay.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
Biden works to limit conflict as Mideast edges closer to all-out war
next post
Biden and Harris visit storm-ravaged areas

You may also like

Democrats’ ads shift from Trump to abortion and...

August 15, 2024

Control of House heads toward another cliffhanger election

September 15, 2024

After raising complaints, Trump says he’ll participate in...

August 28, 2024

Violent threats and attacks escalate tensions in Trump-Harris...

September 18, 2024

Democrats target GOP over reproductive rights as election...

September 18, 2024

Republicans face backlash for lawsuits targeting overseas and...

October 15, 2024

Arlington County ex-firefighter charged with Jan. 6 police...

September 14, 2024

A GOP operative accused a monastery of voter...

January 7, 2026

Trump pitches aid for Detroit automakers amid electoral...

October 11, 2024

Fact-checking Kamala Harris at the Democratic convention on...

August 23, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Blackrock Silver to Present at the Precious Metals and Critical Minerals Virtual Investor Conference on February 10th 2026

      February 7, 2026
    • Saga Metals Acknowledges U.S. Strategic Critical Minerals Reserve “Project Vault” and Highlights Titanium’s Strategic Importance to North American Defense Supply Chains

      February 7, 2026
    • After Major Gold Payout, Bian Ximing Turns Bearish Sights on Silver

      February 7, 2026
    • Equity Metals Exhibiting at the 2026 PDAC

      February 7, 2026
    • African Discovery Groupannounces signing of Definitive Sales and Purchase Agreementfor Butembo Copper Asset in the Democratic Republic of Congo; name change to Copper Intelligence, Inc

      February 7, 2026
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (934)
    • Economy (839)
    • Investing (3,840)
    • Politics (747)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2026 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved