Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
Gary Savage: Gold, Silver — Next Price Targets...
May Production Update – Processing Underway
Oil Price and Inflation: What’s the Correlation?
Heritage Mining Announces Closing of Strategic Investment
High Grade surface silver results up to 920g/t...
Multiple Uranium Anomalies Identified at Key NT Projects
Accent Trial Data Demonstrates that Narmafotinib + Chemotherapy...
Eric Nuttall: Oil vs. Natural Gas Stocks, Plus...
EL2780 Award – New Targets from Airborne MT
SAGA Metals Appoints Vernon Shein, Former Exploration Manager...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

RFK Jr.’s name to be removed from N.C. ballots after state Supreme Court ruling

by admin September 10, 2024
September 10, 2024
RFK Jr.’s name to be removed from N.C. ballots after state Supreme Court ruling

North Carolina’s Supreme Court on Monday ruled that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. can have his name removed from election ballots in the key swing state, denying an appeal from the State Board of Elections that would have kept him on the ballot.

Local election officials estimate that designing, printing and preparing new ballots without Kennedy’s name will delay the process of sending out ballots by a minimum of two weeks and cost cash-strapped county offices more than $1 million, The Washington Post reported last week.

If Kennedy stays on the ballot, “it could disenfranchise countless voters who mistakenly believe that plaintiff remains a candidate for office,” the North Carolina Supreme Court said in its 4-3 ruling.

It acknowledged that the process of printing new ballots will “require considerable time and effort by our election officials and significant expense to the State” but said that this was a price worth paying to “protect voters’ fundamental right to vote their conscience.”

When Kennedy suspended his independent presidential campaign and endorsed former president Donald Trump last month, he also requested that his name be withdrawn from ballots in 10 battleground states, which he said was to ensure he does not swing the election to Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee.

Earlier this week, the North Carolina State Court of Appeals ordered a reprint of mail ballots without Kennedy’s name, prompting the State Board of Elections to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.

In its plea, the board pointed out that Kennedy had not sought to remove his name in all states, mitigating his right to do so in North Carolina, particularly considering how local election officials would be adversely affected.

Karen Brinson Bell, executive director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, said Monday in a statement following the North Carolina Supreme Court’s ruling that 27 counties had started printing ballots and almost all others had finalized their proofs at the time of Kennedy’s withdrawal announcement Aug. 23.

More than half of the counties had started printing ballots by the time Kennedy’s campaign contacted the state board three days later to ask about the process of withdrawing his name, Bell said.

“We will continue to consult with counties and ballot vendors to determine the feasible start date for distributing absentee ballots statewide,” she said, adding that discussions had begun with the Defense Department on a potential waiver of the Sept. 21 federal deadline to send out overseas and military ballots, should ballots not be ready in all counties by that date.

Earlier Monday, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled against Kennedy’s request to remove his name from ballots there, reversing a lower court’s ruling last week.

Kennedy “neither pointed to any source of law that prescribes and defines a duty to withdraw a candidate’s name from the ballot nor demonstrated his clear legal right to performance of this specific duty,” the decision said.

Harris and Trump are locked in a tight race in the seven battleground states that are most likely to determine the outcome of the election. In North Carolina, Trump currently leads Harris by less than one point, according to The Washington Post’s polling average, while Harris leads Trump by one point in Michigan.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
Fireweed Updates Macpass Resource Estimate, Adding Boundary Zone to Yukon Zinc Project
next post
Sen. Tuberville blocks promotion of Lloyd Austin’s top military aide

You may also like

Indicted pro-Trump lawyer who leaked emails is removed...

August 14, 2024

She was accused of a crime for taking...

August 28, 2024

Trump once faced 91 charges. Now he faces...

September 14, 2024

Trump downplays U.S. troop injuries in 2020 Iranian...

October 2, 2024

Trump cites Democrats’ dangerous rhetoric, but uses it...

September 18, 2024

North Carolina breaks turnout record on first day...

October 19, 2024

Arizona may require proof of citizenship on state...

August 23, 2024

War shifts political views in Chicago’s Ukrainian Village,...

August 20, 2024

GOP asks court to change voting rules in...

September 25, 2024

Decision on Georgia election board threatens Kemp’s détente...

August 30, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Gary Savage: Gold, Silver — Next Price Targets and Long-term Calls

      May 15, 2025
    • May Production Update – Processing Underway

      May 15, 2025
    • Oil Price and Inflation: What’s the Correlation?

      May 15, 2025
    • Heritage Mining Announces Closing of Strategic Investment

      May 15, 2025
    • High Grade surface silver results up to 920g/t Ag recorded ~300m to the north and ~150m to the south of Elizabeth Hill mineralisation

      May 15, 2025
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (662)
    • Economy (829)
    • Investing (1,984)
    • Politics (737)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved