Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
Ongoing Drilling Continues to Return Broad Gold Intercepts
Placement to Fund Further Investment in New Carbon
Lithium Market Forecast: Top Trends for Lithium in...
9 Experts Share Highest-Conviction Sectors for 2026
Zinc Price Forecast: Top Trends for Zinc in...
Bold Ventures Closes $776,800 Non-Brokered Private Placement
Crypto Market Update: Bitcoin ETFs Log Record Outflow...
Westport Announces Board of Directors Update
Beyond HODL: Why the DeFi Technologies Lawsuit Signals...
Josef Schachter: Oil Stock Buy Signal Approaching, 3...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

No, Kamala Harris is not the most liberal senator in history

by admin August 28, 2024
August 28, 2024
No, Kamala Harris is not the most liberal senator in history

In broad strokes — and even in some much narrower strokes — Donald Trump is running the same campaign that he ran in 2020 and that he ran in 2016. Immigration must be curtailed, the elites are keeping you down, his opponents are incomprehensibly radical and bent on destroying the United States for unexplained reasons. There is a pattern to the patter and we hear it all often.

It was therefore unsurprising that Trump on Monday revived an attack line that he’d introduced four years ago, one that fit into his “my opponents are outliers” argument. And, for good measure, he layered in the slur he uses to disparage Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).

Warren, he wrote on social media, “is considered far more Conservative in the U.S. Senate than Comrade Kamala Harris ever was. Is this really what we want to be President of the United States? She will only bring us Poverty, Chaos, and Heartache! Kamala is rated, by far, the Number One Most Liberal Senator.”

This is not true.

It’s rooted, as noted above, in a line of attack deployed during the 2020 election. Then, Trump’s allies seized upon a rating from the government-data organization GovTrack that assessed Harris’s record in the Senate in 2019. Harris was rated “most liberal compared to All Senators,” GovTrack indicated, an assessment derived from its analysis of sponsorship and co-sponsorship of legislation.

But GovTrack’s analysis of Harris’s entire tenure in the Senate paints a different picture. In the 116th Congress, the one that ran through 2019 and 2020, Harris was the fourth-most liberal senator, according to GovTrack, coming in behind Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.). She was still to the left of Warren, but Warren’s position in GovTrack’s analysis wasn’t as a remarkably liberal legislator. Her score was equivalent to Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), for example.

This is only one measure of ideology. Another, more commonly cited metric is the DW-NOMINATE score calculated by Voteview. It’s an effort to track ideology over time, something that’s tricky given that it means trying to compare the ideology of someone who served in 1824 with someone serving in 2024.

Voteview’s methodology considers ideology in the context of government intervention in the economy. On that metric, Warren lands to the left of Harris. In fact, there are 15 senators to Harris’s left — including such unexpected names as Vice President Aaron Burr.

This is admittedly an imperfect measure of how liberal (or conservative) a member of Congress happens to be, particularly since the most recent data for Harris (and Burr, for that matter) is out of date. But on neither measure — GovTrack’s or Voteview’s — is Harris “by far, the Number One Most Liberal Senator.” In Voteview’s data, she’s not even as liberal as Warren.

There is an additional point to draw out of Voteview’s numbers. Republican senators have shifted sharply to the right, particularly since the 110th Congress (which covered 2007 and 2008). This is the advent of the tea party and then Trumpism, visible in the data.

In fact, Harris is closer to the middle in Voteview’s analysis than Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

Don’t expect Trump to point that out.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
How a Zuckerberg letter got Trump to accuse himself of rigging 2020
next post
Trump adds RFK Jr., Gabbard to transition team

You may also like

Hillary Clinton returns to DNC convention as reminder...

August 20, 2024

How busing, school desegregation shaped Kamala Harris’s views...

August 26, 2024

Trump foments distrust of federal law enforcement over...

September 24, 2024

5 takeaways from the Democratic convention, Biden’s speech...

August 20, 2024

Democrats tamp down Gaza dispute — for now...

August 22, 2024

The practical and moral difficulties of deporting millions...

October 25, 2024

White House officials signal delay in U.S. Steel...

September 14, 2024

Democrats fully embrace abortion rights at convention and...

August 22, 2024

The limits of Trump’s Springfield, Ohio, demagoguery

September 14, 2024

Fact-checking the vice-presidential debate between Vance and Walz

October 2, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Ongoing Drilling Continues to Return Broad Gold Intercepts

      January 5, 2026
    • Placement to Fund Further Investment in New Carbon

      January 5, 2026
    • Lithium Market Forecast: Top Trends for Lithium in 2026

      January 5, 2026
    • 9 Experts Share Highest-Conviction Sectors for 2026

      January 4, 2026
    • Zinc Price Forecast: Top Trends for Zinc in 2026

      January 4, 2026
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (916)
    • Economy (829)
    • Investing (3,566)
    • Politics (737)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved