Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
Rich Checkan: Gold, Silver Still “Dirt Cheap” —...
Operations update with mine production up 25% QoQ
Dr. Nomi Prins: Gold, Silver, Uranium and More...
Andy Schectman: Reset Happening Now — Gold is...
Biggest Canadian Defense Contractors and ETFs in 2025
5 Best-performing Gold Stocks on the TSX in...
Barrick Mulls Canadian Exit as Mali Gold Tensions...
Apple, MP Materials Ink US$500 Million Deal to...
Silver Price Update: Q2 2025 in Review
Inflation picks up again in June as tariffs...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

RFK Jr. suspends his campaign — with an appropriately bizarre theory

by admin August 24, 2024
August 24, 2024
RFK Jr. suspends his campaign — with an appropriately bizarre theory

The promise of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s independent 2024 campaign was always something of a mirage. His famous last name combined with the unpopularity of President Joe Biden and former president Donald Trump allowed Kennedy, for a time, to poll better than any third-party candidate had since Ross Perot in the 1990s — near 20 percent.

But his steady decline since then makes it clear that this was never about firm support of Kennedy the candidate.

And Friday, Kennedy’s campaign effectively concluded with another mirage — one that epitomizes how unserious a candidate he proved to be.

Kennedy announced that he is suspending his campaign, as expected, and endorsing Trump, as expected. There is reason to believe this could help Trump on the margins. That’s because Kennedy’s few supporters (he’s down to about 5 percent in the polling averages) tend to lean more toward Trump and the GOP.

But Kennedy didn’t stop there. He insisted he is suspending but not ending his campaign. And he even fantasized about a scenario in which he could still become president.

It is not a realistic proposal.

Kennedy signaled that he would seek to withdraw from the ballots only in the swing states, while remaining on the ballots in firmly blue and red states. The idea is that he could still amass votes without being a spoiler in the states that matter.

Why would those votes be important? Because he argued he could still be elected if Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris split the electoral college vote and there was no outright winner.

“If you do vote for me, and neither of the candidates win 270 electoral votes, which is quite possible — in fact, today our polling shows them tying at 269-269 — I could conceivably still end up in the White House in a contingent election,” Kennedy said.

What Kennedy is describing is indeed theoretically possible, but I can’t emphasize “theoretically” enough.

The Constitution says that if no candidate receives a majority of the electoral votes, the winner is decided by the House, with each state’s delegation casting one vote. (There’s a great primer on all this here.)

The current makeup of the electoral votes in each state means there are some legitimate scenarios in which each candidate ends up with 269. It’s why Trump has pushed for Nebraska to stop awarding electoral votes by congressional district — in hopes of winning a single electoral vote in a blue-leaning Omaha-based district.

For Kennedy’s idea to work, the electoral college would deadlock and the House would somehow skip over the top two finishers for him, perhaps because the state’s delegations also deadlocked over which one they preferred.

But even aside from the far-fetched idea that the House would skip over those two candidates for Kennedy — someone Democrats in particular have no love for — there’s the small matter of how it doesn’t appear that Kennedy would even be eligible in that scenario.

The 12th Amendment states that, in a contingent election, the states would choose “from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President.” In other words, from the top three candidates.

But professor Derek Muller of Notre Dame Law School noted that the third-place finisher must actually win an electoral vote — not just finish in third place in the popular vote.

“If there is a 269-269 tie, only Trump and Harris could be considered under the 12th Amendment,” Muller said. “In order for Kennedy to be considered, he’d need to win at least one electoral vote.”

What this means in practice? It wouldn’t actually be a tie. Kennedy would have to snag an electoral vote somehow. His depressed poll numbers suggest he’s not close to winning a state or a congressional district in one of the two states that divvy up electoral votes by district (Nebraska and Maine).

So he’d basically have to rely upon a “faithless elector” to cast an electoral vote for him that was designated for someone else. But the vast majority of states have laws prohibiting faithless electors.

To recap: We somehow wind up with a tie. He somehow gets an electoral vote. And the House somehow goes for a guy who didn’t truly win a single electoral vote.

“Kennedy seems to be going beyond reality in his quixotic quest to matter,” said Paul Beck, an emeritus professor of political science at Ohio State University.

The final point here is just how discordant this bank-shot-upon-bank-shot theory is next to the other things Kennedy was saying. In announcing his endorsement of Trump, Kennedy pitched the Democratic Party as being anti-democratic, including by citing the fact that Harris has become her party’s nominee despite failing to win a single delegate when she ran in the 2020 primaries.

But here was Kennedy pitching a scenario in which he would somehow be elected president apparently without winning a single electoral vote — or even running a campaign.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
World Copper Announces Corporate Update Webinar
next post
Seeking history, an archivist gathers what protesters at the DNC left behind

You may also like

Republicans face backlash for lawsuits targeting overseas and...

October 15, 2024

In their ‘voting era,’ Swifties for Kamala organize...

August 29, 2024

Zelensky, amid urgent appeal to Biden, confronts U.S....

September 27, 2024

Trump posts ‘I hate Taylor Swift,’ days after...

September 16, 2024

Former congressman George Santos expected to plead guilty

August 18, 2024

5 takeaways from the Democratic convention, Biden’s speech...

August 20, 2024

Harris urges Latino leaders to help mobilize key...

September 19, 2024

Walz moved Minn. schools to the left, opposing...

August 11, 2024

In N.C., some Black voters are uneasy with...

September 1, 2024

The right-wing bubble says Trump will save your...

September 10, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Rich Checkan: Gold, Silver Still “Dirt Cheap” — Best Time to Buy Was Yesterday

      July 17, 2025
    • Operations update with mine production up 25% QoQ

      July 17, 2025
    • Dr. Nomi Prins: Gold, Silver, Uranium and More — I’m Focusing on What’s Real

      July 17, 2025
    • Andy Schectman: Reset Happening Now — Gold is Key, Silver Has Massive Potential

      July 17, 2025
    • Biggest Canadian Defense Contractors and ETFs in 2025

      July 17, 2025
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (768)
    • Economy (829)
    • Investing (2,432)
    • Politics (737)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved