Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
Gold, Silver Prices Spike on US-Iran War
Hudbay to Acquire Arizona Sonoran, Creating North America’s...
Domestic Metals
Terra Clean Provides Corporate Update
Fortune Bay Drills Multiple Gold Zones at Goldfields...
Sankamap Announces $5.0M Private Placement
Brightstar Secures US$120M Bond to Fund Goldfields Project
Top 10 Copper Producers by Country
Blackrock Silver Announces the Appointment of Bernard Poznanski...
ILC Critical Minerals Ltd. Does Not Exercise Option...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

Court rules against Black and Hispanic voters in redistricting case

by admin August 2, 2024
August 2, 2024
Court rules against Black and Hispanic voters in redistricting case

A federal appeals court on Thursday made it harder for Black and Hispanic voters to form coalitions to elect the candidates they prefer in three southern states, overruling long-standing precedents.

For decades, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held that the Voting Rights Act allows voting districts that give Black and Hispanic voters the ability to elect candidates of their choice when they have common interests and can form coalitions. Voting rights advocates have praised such rulings because they allow Black and Hispanic voters to get their voices heard even when each group does not constitute a majority on its own.

After the 2020 Census, commissioners in Texas’s Galveston County drew new lines that dissolved the only coalition district in the county. The Justice Department and voters sued, and a district court judge ruled in their favor, citing the appeals court’s precedents. A panel of three appeals court judges upheld that ruling — but also called for the full appeals court to take up the issue to reverse its prior rulings.

On Thursday, the full appeals court did just that. In a 12-6 decision, it ruled the language in Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and decisions from the Supreme Court do not require coalition districts.

“Nowhere does Section 2 indicate that two minority groups may combine forces to pursue a vote dilution claim,” the court wrote in the majority opinion.

The dissenters issued two opinions, including one that called the majority decision “atextual and ahistorical.”

“Today, the majority finally dismantled the effectiveness of the Voting Rights Act in this circuit, leaving four decades of en banc precedent flattened in its wake,” they wrote.

The case centered on the makeup of the Galveston County Commissioners Court, which consists of four county commissioners elected from districts and a county executive, called a judge, elected by the entire county. Until the new lines were drawn, Black and Hispanic residents made up a majority in one of the four commissioner districts for three decades.

In Galveston County, 58 percent of the voting-age population is White, 22.5 percent is Hispanic and 12.5 percent is Black, according to the decision. Hispanic voters are spread across the county, while Black voters are concentrated in the heart of the county.

The ruling is binding on the three states in the New Orleans-based appeals court’s jurisdiction — Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.

The case was brought by voters with the help of branches of the NAACP and the League of United Latin American Citizens. They did not immediately say Thursday whether they planned to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. County officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

Aaron Schaffer, Robert Barnes and Ann E. Marimow contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
Zodiac Gold: Advancing a District-scale West African Gold Discovery
next post
Inspector general issues report on Secret Service’s handling of Jan. 6 attack

You may also like

Mark Robinson defiant, diminished on trail as staff,...

September 24, 2024

Both Harris, Trump late on transition plans despite...

August 31, 2024

How Tim Walz went from NRA-endorsed to a...

August 12, 2024

Here’s how Donald Trump would lower grocery prices

October 16, 2024

Vance suggests the left stole 2020 … by...

October 12, 2024

John McCain’s son says he will support Kamala...

September 4, 2024

Pelosi on Biden: ‘We did not have a...

August 8, 2024

Vance repeats a bogus Trump claim on ‘factories’...

August 29, 2024

Court may decide if Arizonans with missing citizenship...

September 18, 2024

How Kamala Harris’s media blitz went

October 10, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Gold, Silver Prices Spike on US-Iran War

      March 4, 2026
    • Hudbay to Acquire Arizona Sonoran, Creating North America’s Third-Largest Copper District

      March 4, 2026
    • Domestic Metals

      March 4, 2026
    • Terra Clean Provides Corporate Update

      March 4, 2026
    • Fortune Bay Drills Multiple Gold Zones at Goldfields including 6.61 g/t over 5.0 m within 2.54 g/t over 17.0 m

      March 4, 2026
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (941)
    • Economy (839)
    • Investing (4,022)
    • Politics (747)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2026 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved