Smart Trade Insights
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
Top Posts
Questcorp Mining Announces Upsized Private Placement
Geopolitics, Power and Resources Collide as Global Order...
LAURION Intersects High-Grade Gold and Polymetallic Mineralization in...
Halcones Precious Metals Announces Approval of Warrants Extension
Mayfair Gold Presents the Initial Results from the...
1911 Gold to Present at the Metals &...
Tartisan Nickel Corp. Intersects 11.0 Metres of 1.05%...
Standard Uranium Initiates Winter Drill Program at Corvo...
Crypto Market Update: Clarity Act stalls as Banks...
Ten Bodies Found as Mexico Probes January Kidnapping...
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics

Smart Trade Insights

Politics

Court rules against Black and Hispanic voters in redistricting case

by admin August 2, 2024
August 2, 2024
Court rules against Black and Hispanic voters in redistricting case

A federal appeals court on Thursday made it harder for Black and Hispanic voters to form coalitions to elect the candidates they prefer in three southern states, overruling long-standing precedents.

For decades, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held that the Voting Rights Act allows voting districts that give Black and Hispanic voters the ability to elect candidates of their choice when they have common interests and can form coalitions. Voting rights advocates have praised such rulings because they allow Black and Hispanic voters to get their voices heard even when each group does not constitute a majority on its own.

After the 2020 Census, commissioners in Texas’s Galveston County drew new lines that dissolved the only coalition district in the county. The Justice Department and voters sued, and a district court judge ruled in their favor, citing the appeals court’s precedents. A panel of three appeals court judges upheld that ruling — but also called for the full appeals court to take up the issue to reverse its prior rulings.

On Thursday, the full appeals court did just that. In a 12-6 decision, it ruled the language in Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and decisions from the Supreme Court do not require coalition districts.

“Nowhere does Section 2 indicate that two minority groups may combine forces to pursue a vote dilution claim,” the court wrote in the majority opinion.

The dissenters issued two opinions, including one that called the majority decision “atextual and ahistorical.”

“Today, the majority finally dismantled the effectiveness of the Voting Rights Act in this circuit, leaving four decades of en banc precedent flattened in its wake,” they wrote.

The case centered on the makeup of the Galveston County Commissioners Court, which consists of four county commissioners elected from districts and a county executive, called a judge, elected by the entire county. Until the new lines were drawn, Black and Hispanic residents made up a majority in one of the four commissioner districts for three decades.

In Galveston County, 58 percent of the voting-age population is White, 22.5 percent is Hispanic and 12.5 percent is Black, according to the decision. Hispanic voters are spread across the county, while Black voters are concentrated in the heart of the county.

The ruling is binding on the three states in the New Orleans-based appeals court’s jurisdiction — Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.

The case was brought by voters with the help of branches of the NAACP and the League of United Latin American Citizens. They did not immediately say Thursday whether they planned to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. County officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

Aaron Schaffer, Robert Barnes and Ann E. Marimow contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

previous post
Zodiac Gold: Advancing a District-scale West African Gold Discovery
next post
Inspector general issues report on Secret Service’s handling of Jan. 6 attack

You may also like

Special counsel seeks delay in Trump election subversion...

August 9, 2024

Could Mark Robinson actually damage Trump?

September 21, 2024

Trump says he won’t debate Harris again before...

September 13, 2024

Montana ranger comes forward with account of Sheehy...

October 19, 2024

Georgia judge rules that counties must certify election...

October 16, 2024

Biden calls for putting ‘politics aside’ in visit...

October 4, 2024

How Kamala Harris’s media blitz went

October 10, 2024

Jesse Jackson, slowed at 82, is still showing...

August 25, 2024

Mark Meadows tries to move his Arizona case...

August 16, 2024

Pro-Trump Georgia election board weighs new rules as...

September 20, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Questcorp Mining Announces Upsized Private Placement

      February 11, 2026
    • Geopolitics, Power and Resources Collide as Global Order Frays

      February 11, 2026
    • LAURION Intersects High-Grade Gold and Polymetallic Mineralization in Drill Holes LBX25-101 and LBX25-102 at Ishkoday A-Zone Corridor

      February 11, 2026
    • Halcones Precious Metals Announces Approval of Warrants Extension

      February 11, 2026
    • Mayfair Gold Presents the Initial Results from the 2025 Grade Control Drilling Program at the Fenn-Gib Project

      February 11, 2026
    Promotion Image

    banner ads

    Categories

    • Business (935)
    • Economy (839)
    • Investing (3,866)
    • Politics (747)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: smarttradeinsights.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2026 smarttradeinsights.com | All Rights Reserved